For IT, procurement & privacy teams
Connect what you have. Improve what it delivers.
PACE works with supported FHIR/EHR interfaces, approved APIs, PSP CRMs and structured CSV imports, so programmes can unify operational intelligence without replacing their entire technology estate.
Integration modes
Built to work with the systems your partners use.
- 01
API & secure transfer
REST/webhook patterns, authentication, mapping and operational error handling.
- 02
FHIR / EHR
Approved healthcare records and exchange mappings where supported and authorised.
- 03
Structured CSV onboarding
Controlled import templates, data validation, reconciliation, provenance and repeat imports.
White-label partner deployment
Operate with your PSP brand, on a controlled architecture.
Technology layer
Data intake, risk prioritisation, case workflows, audit events and reporting definitions.
Branded experience
Partner logo, interface theme, programme labels, training material and configured patient communications as supported by contract.
How implementation works
Five accountable steps. No implementation guesswork.
- 01
Discover
Map treatment pathways, users, systems, consent and programme objectives.
Output
Scope & success criteria
- 02
Configure
Set roles, engagement journeys, case rules, reports and white-label configuration.
Output
Configured environment
- 03
Integrate
Connect FHIR/EHR, API/CRM or validated CSV data sources as agreed.
Output
Tested data flow
- 04
Validate
Verify permissions, patient events, case escalation, safety handoffs and audit trails.
Output
Signed implementation acceptance
- 05
Launch & improve
Train authorised users, track operational metrics, reconcile exceptions, review outcomes.
Output
Measurable programme review
Measured rollout
What a successful implementation should demonstrate.
Use agreed, realistic metrics and avoid making treatment-effectiveness claims from a workflow demonstration.
Workflow reliability
Case ownership, overdue actions, acknowledgement, follow-up and data completeness.
Operational efficiency
Nurse assessment time, reporting effort, handover completeness and turnaround.
Continuity monitoring
On-time event rates, persistence measures and intervention follow-through, using agreed definitions.
Trust, privacy & safety
Designed for responsible healthcare data workflows.
Access boundaries
Different users. Different permitted information.
User interfaces should implement role-based permissions, source authorisation and purpose limitation, not simply hide fields visually.
- Patient
- Own engagement and consent-aware programme information
- PSP nurse / manager
- Assigned authorised care-support information, case history and follow-ups
- Treating HCP
- Approved patient-specific monthly reports within verified care relationship
- Pharma PAM / Brand
- Approved aggregate or appropriately de-identified programme measures
- Medical Affairs
- Governed longitudinal datasets under specific scientific and privacy controls
Patient safety
A traceable safety handoff is not a PV department.
PACE can support collection, transfer, acknowledgement and status tracking of potential safety events, with responsibility allocated by approved SOPs.
- 01
Safety capture
Structured event documentation by trained authorised PSP personnel.
- 02
Transfer & acknowledgement
Appropriate routing to the designated company PV contact and receipt tracking.
- 03
Human review
Formal assessment, reporting obligations and medical decisions remain with authorised professionals.
Saudi data governance
Make verifiable, deployment-specific claims.
Saudi PDPL alignment, localisation, security posture and contract responsibilities must be backed by evidence for the selected environment.
Data minimisation
Separate operational patient identifiers from aggregate sponsor reporting.
Security operations
Document access control, encryption, logging, incident response, retention and vendor access.
Implementation governance
Validate data flows, legal basis, clinical responsibilities and lawful cross-organisational sharing.
Governance that can be reviewed, not merely claimed.
Security, regulatory and technical requirements are evaluated against the actual deployment architecture. No certifications, integrations, clinical outcomes or compliance approvals are implied by this page.
Integration discovery
A technical discussion with a defined output.
Data source & owner
PSP CRM, EHR, approved API, structured import
Interface contract
FHIR resources, event mapping, status updates and error handling
Access & consent
Purpose limitation, authorisation and audit logs
Acceptance testing
Completeness, failures, reconciliation and access restrictions
FHIR/EHR support does not mean connectivity to every hospital or insurer is already deployed. Each interface requires agreed scope, endpoint access and validation.
Buyer-ready evaluation
One programme. Clear owners. Evidence before purchase.
| Decision gate | What must be established | Principal owner |
|---|---|---|
| Business fit | Named programme challenge, target user, baseline and improvement hypothesis | Principal ownerPAM or PSP Director |
| Product fit | Relevant live workflow demo; supported features and any configuration gaps | Principal ownerPSP Operations + PACE |
| Integration fit | Source systems, FHIR/EHR interface, API/CSV mapping, test environment, data owner | Principal ownerIT / Digital |
| Trust & safety | Data rights, permissions, consent flow, auditability, PV responsibilities and security review | Principal ownerPrivacy / PV / IT |
| Value assessment | Agreed denominators, baseline period, outcome measures, assumptions and reporting plan | Principal ownerPAM / PSP / Finance |
| Commercial approval | Direct sponsor or PSP-integrated route, contracting party, approval workflow and total costs | Principal ownerProcurement + budget owner |
What comes after a tailored demonstration?
- 1Programme discovery
- 2Scoped demonstration
- 3Technical and privacy diligence
- 4Agreed value evaluation
- 5Purchase route
- 6Implementation planning
One discovery. A precise integration plan.
We map your actual systems and scope the connectors, information flows and programme controls before committing timelines.
Pilot proof-of-value measures
- Time from risk signal to action
- Overdue follow-ups
- Ageing unresolved cases
- Documented resolution
- Persistence / discontinuation
- Handover completeness