For PSP Operations / Patient Support Teams

From Enrolment to Verified Follow-Through. One Connected PSP Operation.

Enrol and assess patients, prioritise follow-up, coordinate nurses, and verify what happened next, within one connected support operation.

  1. 01Which patient needs attention?
  2. 02Who owns the follow-up?
  3. 03What happened next?
Illustrative dashboard
Illustrative PACE PSP programme dashboard: enrolled patients, retention, adherence, open escalations, active nurses and patient tiers.
Illustrative PACE care-team queue for today: declined and unanswered doses first, each with an owner action.
  • Identify persistence risk early

    Detect delayed, missed or extended treatment patterns before patients disengage.

  • Focus on the right patients

    Prioritise high-risk, ageing and unresolved cases based on urgency and programme context.

  • Manage cases efficiently

    Maintain clear ownership, next actions, case status and workload visibility.

  • Verify intervention and outcomes

    Track what was done, whether the barrier was resolved and what happened next.

  • Demonstrate PSP value

    Provide de-identified operational evidence to pharma without relying on manual justification decks.

PSP operations view

Illustrative dashboard

126

Open cases

14

Ageing cases

82%

Documented resolution

4.5

Median days to resolution

Priority queue

CasePathwayRisk reasonUrgencyDays openOwnerNext action
Case 0418Fixed SCExtended intervalHigh risk6Coordinator AConfirm next dose
Case 0391IV-to-SCBarrier unresolvedEmerging risk9Nurse BEscalate barrier
Case 0377Phased SCMissed dose reportedEmerging risk3Coordinator CFollow-up call
Case 0352Fixed SCDelayed doseMonitor2Nurse DReminder check

Persistence-risk mix

  • On rhythm68%
  • Monitor18%
  • Emerging risk10%
  • High risk4%

Open cases by age

  • 0 to 7 days84
  • 8 to 14 days28
  • 15 to 30 days10
  • 30+ days4

Team workload vs capacity

  • Team North38 / 40
  • Team Central41 / 45
  • Team West27 / 40
  • Team East20 / 35
Illustrative dashboard with synthetic, de-identified values.

Interactive multi-role experience

One patient journey. The right view for every role.

Switch roles to see how patients, nurses, operational leaders and pharmaceutical sponsors interact with the same governed journey, without giving every role the same data access.

Patient experience

Support before the next treatment event.

Personalised engagement, treatment reminders, multilingual check-ins and a clear route to support, after appropriate programme enrolment and consent.

  • Digital companion & reminders
  • Support requests & check-ins
  • Consent-aware engagement

Access: the patient’s own programme-facing information.

Role-based access: Patient-level care and case information is restricted to authorised PSP/care roles. Pharmaceutical views are aggregate/de-identified and governed by approved data arrangements.

Full patient support journey

From enrolment and consent to accountable continuity.

PACE joins the operational steps normally scattered across forms, spreadsheets, messages and reporting systems. Select each stage to see what is recorded and who takes responsibility.

Stage 01 / Enrolment

A clean starting point for every programme.

Register an eligible programme participant using authorised fields, capture programme status and preserve the source reference for later reconciliation.

Accountability record

Enrolment record created

Owner: PSP onboarding team

Current challenge

  • Risk becomes visible too late

    Patients may drift before reporting a barrier.

  • High and unbalanced workload

    Teams need to know which patients need attention first and who has capacity.

  • Unclear case ownership

    Actions, next steps and outcomes may not be consistently tracked.

  • Multiple data sources

    Patient information can be spread across tools, increasing coordination effort.

  • Vendor/team changes and handovers

    Continuity can be lost when staff are unavailable or cases transfer.

  • Limited intervention-to-outcome visibility

    Activity reporting does not always show whether support resolved the barrier and improved continuity.

  • Time-consuming pharma reporting

    Manual consolidation reduces time available for patient support.

Operational modules

  • Streamlined enrolment & consent

    Digitise programme enrolment and consent where implemented.

  • Persistence-risk early warning

    On rhythm, monitor, emerging risk and high risk, based on documented treatment-rhythm signals and programme rules/model.

  • Priority queue

    Patient/case ID, therapy, last relevant treatment signal, risk reason, urgency, days open/overdue, owner, next action and status.

  • Case ageing & resolution

    Track ageing buckets, unresolved barriers, response time, resolution status and time to resolution.

  • Dynamic case reassignment

    Maintain support continuity when a nurse/coordinator is unavailable, overloaded or reassigned. Preserve context and next action.

  • Field team capacity & effectiveness

    View workload, coverage, ageing cases, response time, documented resolution and team-level outcomes for resource optimisation.

  • Pharma-ready performance evidence

    Show who needed support, what was done, response progress, resolution and programme-level continuity outcomes in de-identified sponsor reports.

Independence does not mean replacement or adversarial auditing.

PSP teams continue to execute care; PACE helps them prioritise work, preserve handover context and demonstrate documented delivery more clearly to pharma.

PSP Operations workflow

  1. 1Enrol
  2. 2Identify persistence risk
  3. 3Prioritise
  4. 4Assign owner
  5. 5Intervene
  6. 6Verify resolution
  7. 7Monitor continuity
  8. 8Report impact

PSP outcomes

  • Earlier persistence-risk identification
  • Smarter patient prioritisation
  • Clearer case ownership
  • Faster resolution of ageing/unresolved cases
  • More balanced workload
  • Stronger adherence/persistence support
  • Measurable intervention effectiveness
  • Stronger evidence of PSP value to pharma

Safety governance and treating-HCP communication

Safety signals are traceable. Treating HCPs stay informed.

Structured safety / pharmacovigilance reporting and automated monthly patient-specific HCP summaries extend the PACE journey beyond reminders and task tracking, without blurring care-team responsibilities or access rights.
  • Post-enrolment nurse assessment

    Enrol. Obtain consent. Complete the assessment, without duplicate entry.

    PACE gives PSP nurses structured, programme-configurable assessment forms after authorised enrolment and valid digital consent. Reuse approved enrolment details, capture outstanding fields and preserve a timestamped assessment record.

    PACE does not automate the nurse's clinical judgement.

  • Monthly automated HCP reports

    The treating HCP sees their patients' follow-through.

    PACE generates scheduled monthly, HCP-scoped patient summaries that support continuity review. Each authorised treating HCP receives only the patients assigned to them through an approved secure delivery channel.

    Scoped to the authenticated treating HCP's authorised patients.

  • Illustrative PACE safety events log: each reported event with its severity and review status (pending, reviewed, escalated, resolved); patient and symptom details blurred.Illustrative dashboard

    Safety / pharmacovigilance

    Capture. Route. Acknowledge. Track.

    Nurses record a reported safety event using a structured PV form. PACE tracks routing to the authorised safety/PV recipient, acknowledgement, due times and required follow-up under the partner's SOP.

    Does not submit regulatory reports, assess causality, make clinical decisions, or substitute for required PV personnel and reporting obligations.

  • Illustrative PACE caseload handover: the confirm step of moving a nurse's patients to a named colleague.Illustrative dashboard

    Nurse-to-nurse continuity

    A nurse takes leave. Patient follow-ups don't disappear.

    PACE makes temporary case coverage visible to managers and receiving nurses, preserving the task history, urgency and accountability of every approved handover.

    The SLA does not reset when ownership changes.

Clear access boundary: PSP nurses and authorised healthcare recipients may access relevant patient-level reports on a verified need-to-know basis. PSP directors/managers see only their approved operational scope. Pharmaceutical commercial users receive role-appropriate, aggregated/de-identified programme metrics, not these HCP-specific patient reports or PV narratives.

For PSP directors and operations

Make PSP operational capacity visible, actionable and measurable.

Explore how prioritised follow-up and more efficient reporting might release capacity for patient support. Use your programme baseline and change the assumptions freely.
  • No patient-identifiable inputs
  • Assumption-based scenarios
  • Operational capacity is not cash savings

Your operating baseline

Enter programme data

Reporting workload should not duplicate follow-up administration time.

Planning scenario
Admin time reduction
12%
Reporting time reduction
20%

The percentages are illustrative planning assumptions, not published PACE performance results or industry benchmarks.

Illustrative annual opportunity

Illustrative planning scenario

Your operational capacity scenario

Potential hours released
477 hours
Admin + reporting capacity
Equivalent working days
60 days
At 8 hours per day
Possible support interactions
954
If capacity is reassigned
Capacity-value equivalent
SAR 42,912
Not realised cost savings

Modelled manual workload: 3,717 hours/year

12.8% of baseline workload potentially released

Discuss your programme

This tool does not calculate financial ROI, retention improvement, actual cost reduction, or the causal impact of PACE. Real outcomes require a defined baseline and a measured implementation.

Transparent calculation methodology

Integration or white-label

Fit the PSP ecosystem. Close the intervention loop. Preserve continuity.

PACE connects engagement, operational execution and pharma oversight without requiring every partner to abandon existing systems.

Connect

PSP-agnostic data integration

Connect authorised PSP workflows through APIs, existing CRM and EHR interfaces, FHIR-aligned interoperability where supported, or structured CSV imports.

Integration approach scoped to each partner

Enable

White-label PSP deployment

Enable a PSP-branded experience for eligible programmes while retaining PACE's underlying continuity and operational intelligence layer.

Branding and configuration vary by agreement

Bring one programme challenge. See how PACE addresses it.

Walk through prioritisation, case ownership, resolution and de-identified performance evidence for one programme.

Pilot proof-of-value measures

  • Time from risk signal to action
  • Overdue follow-ups
  • Ageing unresolved cases
  • Documented resolution
  • Persistence / discontinuation
  • Handover completeness